Kashere Journal of Education


My Account

Attitude of Science and Technology Education Lecturers and Students Towards Using Metacognitive Strategies in Colleges of Education in North-East Nigeria

Authors: Adamu, J. G., Abdullahi, A. B., Abani, F. S.

Journal Article | Publish Date: 02/December/2021


Abstract The study investigated the attitude of lecturers and students of Science Technology Education and Mathematics (STEM) towards metacognitive learning strategies in Colleges of Education in the North-East Zone of Nigeria. One purpose was identified, one research question answered and one null hypothesis tested. The study employed a descriptive survey research design in which a 16-item instrument, designed by the researchers, was used in collecting data from a sample of 138 respondents were randomly selected, made up of 56 lecturers and 82 students, drawn from 10 Colleges of Education in the North-East Zone. The instrument was validated by two experts in Science Education, drawn from the Department of Education, University of Maiduguri. The validated copy was pilot tested on 25 students and 10 lecturers of the Science Education programme from Sa’adatu Rimi College of Education, Kano, an institution outside the study area. Test re-test method was used to obtain the reliability of the instrument, using the Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient (r) which stood at 0.87. Mean and standard deviation were used in analyzing and answering the research question. The null hypothesis was tested at a 0.05 level of significance using the z-test. The study found that students of Science Technology Education and Mathematics (STEM) in Colleges of Education in the North-East Zone of Nigeria had a positive attitude towards metacognitive learning strategies. The study also found that there was no significant difference between the mean scores of the responses of lecturers and students on the students’ attitude towards metacognitive learning strategies in Colleges of Education in the North-East Zone of Nigeria. It recommended among others, that Students of STEM in Colleges of Education in North-East Zone should continuously develop a positive attitude towards metacognitive learning strategies which have the tendency to improve their performances, and methods should be put in place by lecturers and management of the Colleges of Education to design programmes, activities, and schedules which are able to arouse students’ interest in metacognition and as well sustain such interest. Keywords: Attitude, Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, Metacognition, Metacognitive Learning Strategies


Abdellah, R. (2014). Metacognitive awareness and its relation to academic achievement and teaching performance of pre-service female teachers in Ajman University in UAE, Ajman: University of Ajman of Science & Technology.

Akturk, A. O. & Salin, A. (2011). Literature Review on metacognition and its measurement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15, 3731—3736.

Anderson, H., Coitman, P., Page, C. & Whitebread, D. (2003). Developing independent learning in children aged 3-5. Paper presented at the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction 10th Biennial Conference, Padova, August.

Black, P. & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139—148.

Bonner, J. (1988). Implications of cognitive theory for instructional Design. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 36(1), 3-14.

Cohen, A. D. (2014). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Routledge.

Cullen, J. L. (2013). Children’s ability to cope with failure: Implications of a metacognitive approach for the classroom. Metacognition, Cognition, and 1-fuman Performance, 2, 267- 273.

Darling-Hammond, L., Austin, K., Cheung, M., & Martin, D. (2008). Thinking about thinking: Metacognitive. Retrieved September 21st, 2016 from www.learner.org/resources/seriesl72.Html

Dike, J. W., Mumuni, A. A. O. & Chinda, W. (2017). Metacognitive teaching and learning strategies on secondary school students’ academic performance. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, (1), 14-20.

Ekpenyong, L. E. (2008). Foundation of technical and vocational education and practice. Benin City Ambik press Ltd.

Federal Government of Nigeria (2014). National policy on education. Lagos: NERDC Press

Georghiades, P. (2004). From the general to the situated: three decades of metacognition, International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 365-383.

Kagan, K. H. (2013). Impacts of reading metacognitive strategies and reading attitudes on school success. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(5).

Karpicke, J. D. & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772-775.

Manabete, S. S. (2015). Effectiveness of management practices in technical colleges by college administrators in North-East Geopolitical Zone of Nigeria. Unpublished PhD thesis, Modibbo Adama University of Technology, Yola, Nigeria.

Medina, J. (2008). Brain rules: 12 principles for surviving and thriving at work, home, and school. Seattle, WA: Pear Press.

Novak, J. D. (1987). Metacognitive Strategies to Help Student Learn. National Association for Research in Science. Teaching. Newsletter. 29(3).

Ormrod, J. E. (2004). Human learning. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Paris, S., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In S.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction. Hills- dale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Rahman, F. U. (2011). Assessment of science teachers’ metacognitive awareness and its impact on the performance of students. Unpublished PhD Dissertation Allamalabal Open University, Islamabad.

Sandí-Ureña, G. S. (2008). Design and validation of a multimethod assessment of metacognition and study of the effectiveness of metacognitive interventions. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Clemson, SC: Graduate School of Clemson University.

Sanad, H. A. E. (2014). Using self-regulated strategy development (SRSD) to develop EFL reading and writing kills. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 19(5 version 1), 82-97.

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2004). Self-regulation of learning and performance. Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Schraw, G. & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.

Scoot, B. M. (2008). Exploring the effects of student perceptions of metacognition across academic domains. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Indianapolis, IN: Graduate Faculty of the Indiana University.

Shannon, S. V. (2008). Using metacognitive strategies and learning styles to create self- directed learners. Institute for Learning Styles Journal, 1 (1).

Steinbach, J. C. (2008). The effect of metacognitive strategy Instruction on writing. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Lexington, KY: The Graduate School of University of Kentucky.

Young, A. & Fry, J. D. (2008). Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1-10.

Journal Management System


Browse Articles By: